
ISDA Chief Executive Officer Scott O'Malia offers informal comments on important OTC derivatives issues in derivatiViews, reflecting ISDA's long-held commitment to making the market safer and more efficient.
ISDA is a big supporter of a globally consistent, risk-based regulatory framework. Unfortunately, it hasn’t always worked out like that. Initial margin (IM) requirements for inter-affiliate derivatives transactions are a case in point. The obligation only exists in the US at present, and even then not by all regulators in that jurisdiction.
This matters because inter-affiliate trades are used by firms to centralize their risk management activities. These internal risk management transactions do not create new counterparty exposures outside the corporate group – in fact, centralizing all the risk in a single risk function creates efficiencies and ultimately limits credit exposure to third parties.
Many global regulators recognize this, including the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which, under both a Democratic and Republican chair, has maintained exemptions for inter-affiliate trades in its IM rules. This bipartisan support also extends to Congress, where both Republicans and Democrats have written to US prudential regulators voicing their support for a rule change.
This isn’t a new concern. Even back in 2015, a bipartisan letter on inter-affiliate IM requirements was sent by the House Committee on Agriculture raising concerns that “additional costs could be passed on to a bank’s uncleared swap customers, often end users, without making these trades safer”.
These are important points. Requiring IM for inter-affiliate transactions diverts resources from being used elsewhere, and also puts firms subject to US rules at a competitive disadvantage. At year-end 2018, the top 20 derivatives dealers had posted approximately $39.4 billion in inter-affiliate IM.
Now, some commentators suggest any attempt to change the inter-affiliate IM requirement represents a weakening of risk management and a roll back of the regulatory framework. That neglects the fact that IM requirements for external-facing trades – the source of exposure to third parties – would not be affected. According to the latest ISDA margin survey, the top 20 dealers held $157.9 billion for their non-cleared derivatives transactions at year-end 2018 (that doesn’t include inter-affiliate IM). That’s on top of $858.6 billion in variation margin collected by the largest 20 firms.
By obtaining an exemption for inter-affiliate trades, firms would essentially avoid having to post and collect duplicate IM amounts – once for the external facing trade and again for the internal risk transfer within the corporate group. That’s an extremely inefficient use of resources.
Margin requirements are an important part of the regulatory reforms that have made the derivatives market safer and more resilient. There’s no appetite to reverse the important changes that have taken place, like clearing, reporting, margin and capital requirements. But there is an opportunity to improve the rules and make them consistent across jurisdictions. This will make the framework more effective and more efficient.
Latest
Updated OTC Derivatives Compliance Calendar
ISDA has updated its global calendar of compliance deadlines and regulatory dates for the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives space.
ISDA/IIF Responds to the PRA Consultation
On July 30th, ISDA and IIF responded to the PRA consultation (CP10/25) on enhancing banks’ and insurers’ approaches to managing climate-related risks, which proposes updates to the Supervisory Statement 3/19 on climate-related risk management for banks and insurers. ISDA and...
ISDA Board Appoints New Chair
ISDA has announced that its Board of Directors has elected Amy Hong as its new Chair. Ms. Hong is Head of Strategy, Investments and Partnerships in the Global Banking & Markets division at Goldman Sachs, responsible for leading strategic initiatives...
Response on Scope of BMR
On July 28, ISDA and the Global Foreign Exchange Division of the Global Financial Markets Association responded to the European Commission’s (EC) consultation on the need to exempt spot foreign exchange (FX) benchmarks under Article 18a of the EU Benchmarks...