Benchmark Fallbacks

Interbank Offered Rates (IBORs), a series of interest rate benchmarks, are undergoing a period of change as regulators and industry groups have recommended that firms transition away from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and other IBORs and prepare to replace them with alternative, overnight Risk Free Rates (RFRs). These RFRs, including SOFR (USD), €STR (EUR) and SONIA (GBP), are typically administered and published by major central banks worldwide. Transitioning to the RFRs will be a demanding and complex process for the industry as RFRs are structurally different from IBORs. They are overnight rates and exhibit different liquidity characteristics and supply/demand issues than IBORs.

To address the risk that one or more IBORs are discontinued while market participants continue to have exposure to that rate, counterparties are encouraged to agree to contractual fallback provisions that would provide for adjusted versions of the RFRs as replacement rates.

Due to the fundamental differences in the nature of IBORs and the RFRs, key adjustments are necessary if fallbacks to RFRs are to take effect in contracts that were originally negotiated to reference the IBORs. ISDA ran public consultations to finalize the adjustment methodologies and subsequently issued a tender invitation for a vendor to perform and distribute these necessary adjustments.

These consultations yielded industry consensus, and more information about them can be found below.

Bloomberg Test Data for IBOR Fallbacks

Bloomberg Rulebook for IBOR Fallback Methodology

2020 Pre-Cessation Fallback Consultation

IBOR Fallback Rate Adjustments FAQs – Updated May 4, 2020

Results – December 2019 Benchmark Fallbacks Supplemental Consultation

December 2019 Benchmark Fallbacks Supplemental Consultation

Results – September 2019 Consultation on Final Parameters

September 2019 Consultation on Final Parameters

Results – May 2019 Supplemental Consultation

Results – May 2019 Consultation on Pre-Cessation Issues

May 2019 Benchmark Fallbacks Consultations

Results – 2018 Benchmark Fallbacks Consultation

2018 Benchmark Fallbacks Consultation

 

Target Timing for Fallback Implementation
Publication of Bloomberg indicative fallback rates Middle of 2020 (before publication of amendments to the 2006 ISDA Definitions and related protocol)
Publication of amendments to the 2006 ISDA Definitions and related protocol July 2020
Effectiveness of amendments to the 2006 ISDA Definitions and related protocol November 2020 (or 4 months after publication)

 

Raising Clients’ Awareness on Portability

Clients accessing a central counterparty (CCP) via a client clearing service provider (CCSP) for over-the-counter (OTC) and exchange-traded derivatives should consider what may happen to their positions and collateral in a scenario in which the CCSP defaults. While regulatory regimes...

Response to FCA on Ancillary Activities Test

On August 28, ISDA and FIA submitted a joint response to the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) consultation paper CP25/19 on the ancillary activities test to determine if commercial users or producers of commodities that trade in commodity derivatives, emission allowances...

Stress Scenarios for CCP IM Simulators

ISDA has published a paper that explains why stress scenarios that central counterparties (CCPs) use for default fund sizing cannot be used for forward-looking initial margin (IM) simulators. Typically, stress scenarios used by CCPs consist of a single step, transitioning...

Paper on EMIR 3 Active Account Representativeness

On September 4, ISDA, the European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA) and FIA shared a paper with EU policymakers requesting clarification on the implementation of the active account requirement under the third European Market Infrastructure Regulation in relation to...