The Chamber of Commerce, SIFMA, and ISDA submitted a letter, in support of defendants-appellees, to the Supreme Court of California requesting depublication of the lower court opinion. The appeal raises the question of whether a California court must decline to enforce a forum selection clause included in a contract that was formed in another State, and which selects a forum outside California for litigation, where the contract also includes a pre-dispute jury trial waiver.
Documents (1) for Letter on Handoush v. Lease Finance Group LLC
Latest
IQ Interview with Mark Uyeda
Mandatory clearing of US Treasury securities is due to begin at the end of this year under rules finalized by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2023. SEC commissioner Mark Uyeda talks to IQ about the benefits of clearing...
Response to FCA on CFI Codes for Transparency
On March 19, ISDA responded to Chapter 3 of the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) Quarterly Consultation CP26/8 on transparency requirements for financial instruments under Market Conduct Sourcebook (MAR) 11. Sections 3.11-3.13 of the consultation paper explain a discrepancy between...
Why We Need Safe and Efficient SFT Markets
Securities financing transactions (SFTs) play a vital role in fostering liquidity, mobilizing collateral and supporting the smooth functioning of derivatives markets. But during periods of stress, secured funding markets often come under pressure just when they’re needed most, with reduced...
Response to BoE on Clearing Exemption for PTRR
On March 11, ISDA submitted a response to the Bank of England’s consultation on a proposed approach to exempting post-trade risk reduction (PTRR) transactions from the derivatives clearing obligation under Article 4 of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR). ISDA...