Private International Law Aspects of Derivatives Contracts Involving DLT

These four papers consider the private international law, or conflict-of-law, aspects of derivatives contracts involving distributed ledger technology (DLT), commonly known as blockchain technology.

The development and implementation of new technologies such as DLT within the derivatives industry have the potential to create a more robust financial markets infrastructure, achieve operational efficiencies through increased automation and reduce costs for market participants.

As these technologies mature, it is important to understand the evolving legal treatment of derivatives traded on DLT platforms. Given the novel complications over where data, assets and even counterparties are located in a DLT environment, it is useful to examine key questions on how to determine which law applies and how to evaluate conflicts of governing law. While some jurisdictions have produced analysis on areas of perceived legal uncertainty, these issues remain untested in many of the jurisdictions and cross-border environments important to the derivatives industry.

In January 2020, ISDA, R3, Clifford Chance and the Singapore Academy of Law jointly published Private International Law Aspects of Smart Derivatives Contracts Utilizing Distributed Ledger Technology. That paper considered the private international law, or conflict-of-law, aspects of derivatives contracts governed by the laws of England and Wales or Singapore involving DLT.

As a result, ISDA (in association with R3 and local counsel) has published additional papers that consider these issues from French, Irish, Japanese and New York law perspectives.

Read the papers and a jurisdiction comparison table by clicking on the PDFs below.

ISDA Briefing on EMIR Compromise Amendments under MISP

On November 2, ISDA published its recommendations on the European Parliament (EP) compromise amendments to EMIR under the Market Integration and Supervision Package (MISP). The briefing covers five areas: transaction reporting (Article 9), non-financial counterparties (Article 10), initial margin model...

Response on Transaction Reporting and Transparency

On October 30, ISDA submitted comments on the European Parliament’s (EP) proposed transaction reporting and transparency-related amendments to the European Commission’s Market Integration and Supervision Package (MISP). On transaction reporting, ISDA commends the EP’s ambition but cautions against trying to...

Joint Paper on EC Tax Omnibus

On November 5, ISDA, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) and the International Securities Lending Association (ISLA) submitted a paper to support the proposed European Commission (EC) Tax Omnibus as a route to simpler, more certain cross-border taxation....