The cross-trade association EMIR Reporting Best Practices were initially developed and published in March 2020, covering both over-the-counter and exchange-traded derivatives. These best practices were developed to improve the accuracy and efficiency of trade reporting and to reduce compliance costs, and are available to all market participants to access and implement.
A review of the best practices was carried out by member firms in 2021, and subsequently 23 fields have either been updated or new best practices put in place. Additionally, the EU-EMIR and UK-EMIR reporting fields – along with their related best practices – have been set out on separated tabs.
The EMIR Reporting Best Practices is a cross-trade association initiative developed jointly by the European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA), European Venues and Intermediaries Association (EVIA), Futures Industry Association (FIA), German Investment Funds Association (BVI), Global Foreign Exchange Division (GFXD), International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) and Investment Association (IA).
Documents (1) for EMIR Reporting Best Practices
Latest
Response to ESMA Guarantees
On April 30, ISDA responded to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) consultation paper on guarantees as central counterparty (CCP) collateral and certain aspects of CCP investment policy. ISDA broadly supports ESMA’s proposed draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) to...
ISDA AGM Studio: Jenny Cosco and Jason Granet
Jenny Cosco, global head of government relations and regulatory strategy at LSEG, and Jason Granet, chief investment officer at BNY, speak with Tara Kruse, ISDA’s global head of derivative products and infrastructure, about how firms can manage liquidity pressures during...
Updated OTC Derivatives Compliance Calendar
ISDA has updated its global calendar of compliance deadlines and regulatory dates for the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives space.
Capital Models Benchmarking: A Framework for Counterparty Credit Risk Internal Models
When firms implement capital models in line with supervisory standards, a range of interpretative and implementation choices inevitably arise. These choices reflect differences in modeling approaches, data availability, system architecture and risk management practices, and can lead to variation in...