On August 28, ISDA and FIA submitted a joint response to the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) consultation paper CP25/19 on the ancillary activities test to determine if commercial users or producers of commodities that trade in commodity derivatives, emission allowances or derivatives of emission allowances can benefit from the ancillary activities exemption from the need to seek authorization as an investment firm.
A key concern in the consultation paper was a proposal to include trading venue activity in the de minimis (annual threshold) test. ISDA and FIA argued strongly against this proposal, on the grounds it could diminish the international competitiveness of the UK commodity derivatives market, would add complexity and burden to firms applying the test and risks changing the outcome of the test, which the FCA stated was not the intention.
Documents (1) for Joint Response to FCA Consultation on Ancillary Activities Test for Commodity Derivatives Trading
Latest
Transition to Mandatory Central Clearing
US Treasury securities sit at the heart of global financial markets and serve as one of the primary forms of high-quality collateral across derivatives and securities financing markets. The transition to mandatory central clearing of US Treasuries therefore has implications...
ISDA Publishes Updated ISDA SIMM Governance
ISDA has published an updated version of the ISDA SIMM® Governance Framework, which sets out the principles under which the ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model® operates and the process through which it will be reviewed and amended on a consistent...
ISDA Response to PRA IMA Consultation
On September 18, ISDA, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe, the Institute of International Finance and UK Finance submitted a joint response to the UK Prudential Regulation Authority consultation on adjustments to the internal model approach (IMA) for the...
Calibration Test – IQ September 2026
Calibrating capital requirements is a highly complex undertaking and getting it wrong can have serious consequences. Too much lenience might lead to banks holding insufficient capital to mitigate their risks. But excess conservatism can put balance sheets under strain, forcing...