On April 2, ISDA published a paper on why single-sided reporting does not compromise the quality and integrity of data received by supervisors. The paper addresses concerns among regulators that moving from dual-sided reporting would adversely affect the quality of data they receive and points out that true single-sided reporting would reduce reporting costs and administrative workload in alignment with the EU’s simplification and burden reduction agenda and would enhance consistency with other global reporting regimes.
Documents (1) for ISDA Paper on Maintaining Data Integrity for Single-sided Reporting
Latest
Moving Regulatory Reporting up a Gear with AI
The aim of derivatives regulatory reporting is to improve transparency so regulators can monitor market activity and identify emerging risks. Although reporting rules and subsequent updates have resulted in improvements, they haven’t achieved fully consistent outcomes, leading to implementation and...
Sydney DTF: Scott O'Malia Opening Remarks
ISDA/AFMA Sydney Derivatives Trading Forum October 26, 2026 Opening Remarks Scott O’Malia ISDA Chief Executive Good morning, and welcome to the ISDA and AFMA Derivatives Trading Forum. Thanks for joining us today, and a big thank you to our...
ISDA Publishes FpML Version 5.14
ISDA has published a new version of its Financial products Markup Language (FpML), a widely used open-source standard for the electronic dealing and processing of derivatives transactions. The latest iteration – version 5.14 – incorporates several key modifications and updates...
Accounting for Tokenized Assets as Collateral
The use of tokenized assets as collateral for derivatives and securities financing transactions (SFTs) is emerging as a significant development in global capital markets. Financial institutions are increasingly evaluating tokenized representations of money market funds, government securities and other high-quality...