ISDA has today published a new legal opinion that recognizes the enforceability of close-out netting under Chinese law. The netting opinion coincides with the entry into force of the Futures and Derivatives Law (FDL), which establishes a statutory framework for the trading of futures and derivatives in China.
ISDA has consistently advocated for enforceable close-out netting as an indispensable pre-requisite for safe and efficient derivatives markets and has published netting opinions for more than 80 jurisdictions around the world. By allowing counterparties to reduce their obligations to a single net payment due from one party to another, netting significantly reduces credit risk. As of the end of 2021, the global gross market value of derivatives contracts stood at $12.4 trillion, whereas the gross credit exposure, which adjusts gross market values for legally enforceable bilateral netting agreements, amounted to $2.5 trillion, according to data from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
“We are very pleased these legal reforms in China include the important step of recognizing close-out netting. The publication of the netting opinion, which coincides with the FDL coming into effect, marks a historic milestone in the development of a well-functioning derivatives market in China. Having a netting opinion ready from August 1 will give firms the certainty they need to trade derivatives with Chinese counterparties, enabling effective risk management and supporting economic growth,” said Scott O’Malia, ISDA’s Chief Executive.
The first iteration of the FDL was published for consultation in April 2021, with provisions recognizing netting enforceability and confirming that close-out netting should not be stayed, invalidated or revoked because a party has entered bankruptcy proceedings. After the law was passed in April 2022, ISDA commissioned law firm King & Wood Mallesons to draft the netting opinion to coincide with the implementation of the FDL.
“Having a netting opinion available gives firms a high degree of legal certainty that netting is enforceable, giving them comfort to trade with Chinese firms, which in turn should encourage more participants and increase liquidity. Managing credit risk on a net basis leads to significant efficiencies, which will mean more credit is available for firms looking to raise finance or hedge their exposures,” said Katherine Tew Darras, ISDA’s General Counsel.
While China is the world’s second largest economy, its derivatives market represents only around 1% of global derivatives market turnover, according to BIS data. With netting now in place, further policy measures will be needed to continue to develop and grow the onshore derivatives market. ISDA set out a series of policy recommendations in a whitepaper in December 2021, covering risk governance, market structure, counterparty and market risk management, and the regulatory framework.
The ISDA netting opinion is available here.
For Press Queries, Please Contact:
Nick Sawyer, ISDA London, +44 20 3808 9740, nsawyer@isda.org
Lauren (Dobbs) Springer, ISDA New York, +1 212 901 6019, ldobbs@isda.org
Joel Clark, ISDA London, +44 20 3808 9760, jclark@isda.org
Christopher Faimali, ISDA London, +44 20 3808 9736, cfaimali@isda.org
Nikki Lu, ISDA Hong Kong, +852 2200 5901, nlu@isda.org
Documents (1) for ISDA Publishes China Netting Opinion as FDL Comes into Effect
Latest
Transition to Mandatory Central Clearing
US Treasury securities sit at the heart of global financial markets and serve as one of the primary forms of high-quality collateral across derivatives and securities financing markets. The transition to mandatory central clearing of US Treasuries therefore has implications...
ISDA Publishes Updated ISDA SIMM Governance
ISDA has published an updated version of the ISDA SIMM® Governance Framework, which sets out the principles under which the ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model® operates and the process through which it will be reviewed and amended on a consistent...
ISDA Response to PRA IMA Consultation
On September 18, ISDA, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe, the Institute of International Finance and UK Finance submitted a joint response to the UK Prudential Regulation Authority consultation on adjustments to the internal model approach (IMA) for the...
Calibration Test – IQ September 2026
Calibrating capital requirements is a highly complex undertaking and getting it wrong can have serious consequences. Too much lenience might lead to banks holding insufficient capital to mitigate their risks. But excess conservatism can put balance sheets under strain, forcing...