ISDA Submits Supplementary Analysis to ESMA on Reporting Costs

ISDA has submitted to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) an analysis of the costs of regulatory reporting, which proposes where savings can be made most effectively.

This document supplements the recent response submitted by ISDA, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe, FIA and the Global FX Division of the Global Financial Markets Association to ESMA’s call for evidence on a comprehensive approach for the simplification of financial transaction reporting. The new analysis and proposals reflected in this supplementary document were developed based on member feedback to a questionnaire carried out by ISDA. All answers have been anonymized and aggregated.

The responses supported many of the arguments put forward in the original response, with the most impactful cost saving identified as the delineation by instrument (OTC derivatives under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation and exchange-traded derivatives under the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation) as proposed under Option 1a. There was also strong support for single-sided reporting and the removal of pairing and matching requirements.

ISDA developed this analysis for ESMA’s consideration in drafting the final report following the call for evidence.

ISDA Publishes Updated ISDA SIMM Governance

ISDA has published an updated version of the ISDA SIMM® Governance Framework, which sets out the principles under which the ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model® operates and the process through which it will be reviewed and amended on a consistent...

ISDA Response to PRA IMA Consultation

On September 18, ISDA, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe, the Institute of International Finance and UK Finance submitted a joint response to the UK Prudential Regulation Authority consultation on adjustments to the internal model approach (IMA) for the...

Calibration Test – IQ September 2026

Calibrating capital requirements is a highly complex undertaking and getting it wrong can have serious consequences. Too much lenience might lead to banks holding insufficient capital to mitigate their risks. But excess conservatism can put balance sheets under strain, forcing...