On April 2, ISDA published a paper on why single-sided reporting does not compromise the quality and integrity of data received by supervisors. The paper addresses concerns among regulators that moving from dual-sided reporting would adversely affect the quality of data they receive and points out that true single-sided reporting would reduce reporting costs and administrative workload in alignment with the EU’s simplification and burden reduction agenda and would enhance consistency with other global reporting regimes.
Documents (1) for ISDA Paper on Maintaining Data Integrity for Single-sided Reporting
Latest
ISDA Comments: OSC Call for Feedback
On June 26, 2026, ISDA submitted comments to the Ontario Securities Commission’s (OSC) consultation on facilitating access to its regulatory framework and reducing burden for capital markets participants by publishing a machine-readable dataset of regulatory instruments. The comments are supportive...
ISDA Comments on EP's MISP Draft Reports
On July 15, ISDA shared comments with policymakers in the European Union on the European Parliament’s (EP) draft reports by Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Markus Ferber and MEP Eero Heinäluoma on the Market Integration and Supervision Package (MISP)....
Building Markets, Creating Opportunity
Deep and liquid derivatives markets are fundamental to the development of well-functioning financial markets and healthy economies. They support lending, investment and financial stability, creating the certainty needed for economic growth. But strong derivatives markets do not emerge by chance....
Key Trends in OTC Derivatives Market H2 2025
The latest data from the Bank for International Settlements over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives statistics shows an increase in notional outstanding of OTC derivatives during the second half of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. Notional outstanding rose across all...