This paper examines some factors that central counterparties (CCPs) should consider in structuring partial tear-up methodologies so as not to contravene rules on offsetting under the applicable accounting standards, which would render cleared derivatives uneconomical. The paper notes that CCPs can structure partial tear-up in a number of ways. Whatever the structure, the CCP’s methodology for partial tear-up should be transparent, written in its rule book, available to all potentially affected parties and should respect US GAAP and IFRS accounting standards.
Documents (1) for Consideration of Accounting Analysis for CCP Recovery and Continuity Tools
Latest
Trading Book Capital: Scott O'Malia Remarks
Trading Book Capital: Capital Conundrum, Navigating Basel III Endgame February 5, 2026 Welcoming Remarks Scott O’Malia, ISDA Chief Executive Good afternoon, and welcome to ISDA’s Trading Book Capital event – it’s great to be here in New York. We...
ISDA In Review – January 2026
A compendium of links to new documents, research papers, press releases and comment letters published by ISDA in January 2026.
ISDA Responds to RBI Unique Transaction Identifier (UTI) Proposals
On November 14, 2025, ISDA submitted comments to a Draft Circular from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) proposing to mandate the global Unique Transaction Identifier (UTI) for all transactions in OTC markets for Rupee interest rate derivatives, forward contracts in Government...
How and Why Pension Funds Use Derivatives
With over $58 trillion in assets globally, pension fund managers are major participants in financial markets and play a vital role in helping to provide post-retirement incomes for plan employees. Meeting such an important goal requires careful consideration of investment...