Post-trade risk reduction has become increasingly common as a means to reduce risks in the derivatives market. Portfolio compression is a case in point: offsetting trades between multiple parties are torn up, which reduces the size of gross exposures, in turn reducing systemic risk. Over €1,000 trillion in derivatives exposures has been eliminated in this manner.
Regulators recognize the value of compression. Under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), market participants with more than 500 over-the-counter (OTC) trades on their books are required to examine the possibility of performing portfolio compression twice a year.
However, EMIR simultaneously disincentivizes use of this service by requiring administrative trades that result from compression, and which fall under the clearing mandate, to be cleared. This limits the ability of participants to perform compression and reduce risk.
The same is true of other post-trade risk reduction services like counterparty rebalancing. This involves inserting new, market-risk neutral transactions into netting sets to reduce risk exposures between counterparties. This decreases counterparty credit risk and therefore reduces systemic risk. However, those new transactions are required to be cleared if they are subject to the clearing obligation, preventing counterparty rebalancing risk reduction from taking place. As a result, counterparty rebalancing today is only limited to FX derivatives, which are not subject to the clearing obligation. Over €100 billion in counterparty credit risk has been reduced in this manner.
ISDA, the EBF, ICMA and ISLA believe EMIR should be amended as part of the Regulatory Fitness and Performance program (REFIT) to allow non-price forming, market-risk neutral transactions that result from post-trade risk reduction services to be exempted from the clearing obligation.
To read the full whitepaper, click on the link below.
Documents (1) for Incentivizing Post-trade Risk Reduction
Latest
Joint Trades Submit Letter to BCBS Calling for Recalibration of Cryptoasset Prudential Standards
ISDA, in partnership with a coalition of leading global financial trade associations (“Joint Trades”), and with advisory support from Boston Consulting Group (BCG), Ashurst, and Sullivan & Cromwell, submitted a letter to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). The...
ISDA Response on Common Carbon Data Model
On August 12, ISDA responded to a consultation from the Climate Data Steering Committee (CDSC) on a Common Carbon Credit Data Model. ISDA members believe the Group-of-20 carbon data model initiative is a positive step in addressing data gaps and...
Joint Response on RBA Consultation
On August 11, ISDA and FIA submitted a joint response to the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) on its consultation on guidance for Australia’s clearing and settlement facility resolution regime. The associations welcome publication of the draft guidance, which provides...
SwapsInfo H1 2025 and Q2 2025
Interest rate derivatives (IRD) trading activity increased in the first half of 2025, driven by continued interest rate volatility, evolving central bank policy expectations and persistent macroeconomic uncertainty. Trading in index credit derivatives also rose, as market participants responded to...