ISDA Chief Executive Officer Scott O'Malia offers informal comments on important OTC derivatives issues in derivatiViews, reflecting ISDA's long-held commitment to making the market safer and more efficient.
The final implementation phases of the initial margin (IM) requirements for non-cleared derivatives will bring hundreds of new entities into scope of the rules, affecting thousands of counterparty relationships. This will, in turn, drive a big increase in daily margin calls, settlement volumes and collateral disputes that could put a real strain on the industry unless market participants seize the opportunity to transform and automate their collateral management processes.
At ISDA, we have been working to improve the collateral process to bring greater operational efficiency, with a strong focus on new mutualized operational solutions, best practices and greater automation.
For the smaller entities that will come into scope under phase five on September 1 and phase six on September 1, 2022, the IM rules pose a significant compliance burden. As I have written previously, exchanging IM in line with the rules requires diligent preparation over a period of at least nine to 12 months. From setting up relationships with custodians to negotiating documents and testing systems and processes, in-scope firms need to prepare well and prepare early.
But there is also an opportunity to leverage industry solutions to bring greater automation and efficiency to collateral management. By implementing a portfolio reconciliation and dispute resolution program, for example, firms will be better prepared to manage disputes, while automating the collateral management process will put them in a better position to deal with the increase in margin calls and settlements.
Fortunately, phase-five and phase-six entities can benefit from the platforms and technologies that were developed for earlier phases, enabling them not just to meet the requirements but to enhance operating processes at the same time. For example, the ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model means firms don’t have to develop their own IM calculation methodology but can instead use an industry model that has been developed and refined over time. ISDA Create drastically reduces the time, resources and risks associated with negotiating legal documentation, while the Common Domain Model allows data and information from those documents to be fully digitized and passed seamlessly to other systems and processes.
Firms also have an opportunity to use the IM compliance process as a springboard to transform collateral management. In 2017, ISDA published a blueprint for the future of collateral processing and, more recently, we developed a series of collateral management transformation toolkits. These toolkits provide resources to help firms identify opportunities to improve their collateral management in key areas, including onboarding custodians for segregated accounts and automating collateral processes.
There is no regulatory requirement to automate collateral management, of course. But by understanding the challenges firms faced in the earlier IM phases and the tools they developed to meet those challenges, smaller entities in phases five and six can realize significant efficiency gains that have the potential to extend well beyond the exchange of margin.
As the phase-five deadline approaches in a few weeks’ time, preparation for phase six will crank up next month. We know that phase six will be the heaviest lift, given the hundreds of firms involved and the amount of preparation required. Using this opportunity to automate key processes and transform collateral management as part of their compliance will ensure they are fully prepared for the derivatives market of the future.
Latest
Guidance for EU IM Model Application for ISDA SIMM®
EU financial and non-financial EU counterparties exchanging IM based on ISDA SIMM® should have already submitted an initial application for authorisation to their competent authority (CA), and ECB if applicable. If not, they should do so timely to ensure continued...
Joint Response on Stress Testing Framework
On February 23, ISDA, the Bank Policy Institute, the American Bankers Association, the Financial Services Forum, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and the US Chamber of Commerce jointly responded to the US Federal Reserve’s consultation on the stress...
Joint Letter on Italian 2026 Budget Law
On February 23, ISDA, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe and the International Securities Lending Association jointly sent a letter to the Italian tax authorities about changes to withholding tax on dividends made in the 2026 budget law, which...
Response to FCA on UK MIFIR Consultation
On February 20, ISDA responded to the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) consultation on improving the UK Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MIFIR) transaction reporting regime. The consultation aims to reduce the regulatory burden on firms, support sustained economic growth in...
