The Chamber of Commerce, SIFMA, and ISDA submitted a letter, in support of defendants-appellees, to the Supreme Court of California requesting depublication of the lower court opinion. The appeal raises the question of whether a California court must decline to enforce a forum selection clause included in a contract that was formed in another State, and which selects a forum outside California for litigation, where the contract also includes a pre-dispute jury trial waiver.
Documents (1) for Letter on Handoush v. Lease Finance Group LLC
Latest
Response to EC Call for Evidence on Tax Omnibus
On March 30, ISDA, the International Securities Lending Association and the Association for Financial Markets in Europe responded to the European Commission’s (EC) call for evidence on the tax omnibus. The associations argue that inconsistent interpretation of “beneficial ownership” among...
Managing Risk for Australian Superannuation Funds
Assets managed by the Australian superannuation sector reached A$4.5 trillion in December 2025, equivalent to around 160% of Australia’s GDP. Given its size, the sector has rapidly expanded its global footprint, with the share of offshore investments growing as a...
Updated OTC Derivatives Compliance Calendar
ISDA has updated its global calendar of compliance deadlines and regulatory dates for the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives space.
Next Steps on a Much Improved Basel III Endgame
Publication of the revised Basel III endgame proposal earlier this month marks an important step towards completion of the global capital reforms, giving banks much-needed clarity on the likely calibration of the rules in the US. The new proposal is...