It’s difficult to talk in general terms about the derivatives market in Asia-Pacific. Looked at as a whole, derivatives turnover in the region has been growing, and that growth is expected to continue. But activity is concentrated in a few key trading hubs like Hong Kong – the venue for this year’s ISDA Annual General Meeting. A number of other jurisdictions are at much earlier stages of development, and need to establish strong legal and regulatory foundations to encourage further growth in local derivatives markets.
That might sound obvious, but it’s important. In a new ISDA survey of 480 derivatives market participants active in Asia-Pacific, published in this issue of IQ, the existence of a sound legal and regulatory framework was identified as one of the main factors in determining where to trade. In particular, certainty over the enforceability of close-out netting was highlighted as essential to the development of robust and efficient derivatives markets.
There has been recent progress towards achieving that in certain jurisdictions, but – as it stands – there is still ambiguity over how close-out netting will be treated in three of the region’s biggest economies and Group-of-20 members: China, India and Indonesia. Given the importance of close-out netting as a risk mitigant, we believe resolving this issue is the single most important step policy-makers can take to ensure the development of safe, efficient and liquid derivatives markets in their jurisdictions.
The survey highlighted the importance of other regulatory issues, including the cross-border harmonization of rule sets. This has long been a key strategic priority for ISDA, and we recently proposed a set of recommendations to help mitigate fragmentation in global derivatives markets. Central to this is the development of a risk-based framework for comparability evaluations, alongside a predictable and consistent equivalence and substituted compliance process that is focused on outcomes.
Greater consistency between national rule sets would also help, but that doesn’t mean rules necessarily need to be identical in every market. For smaller jurisdictions or those with limited market activity, it may not be appropriate to implement the same rules as those applied in the US and Europe – at least, not at this stage. The most effective strategy for local regulators would be getting those legal foundations in place first.
Documents (1) for Bearing East – IQ April 2019
Latest
Four Reforms for Successful US Treasury Clearing
The US Treasury market is the world’s biggest and most systemically important market. It’s the oil that keeps the wheels of the global financial system turning and is the primary means by which the US government raises funding. It’s therefore...
ISDA Response to ESMA on CCP Model Validation
On April 7, ISDA responded to the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) consultation on draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) under article 49(5) of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), on the conditions for an application for validation of model...
Scott O'Malia Testimony on US Treasury Clearing
On April 8, ISDA CEO Scott O'Malia testified on the implementation of mandatory US Treasury clearing before the US House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services Task Force on Monetary Policy, Treasury Market Resilience, and Economic Prosperity. “The US Treasury...
Joint Letter on Changes to French General Tax Code
On March 31, ISDA, the Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) and the International Securities Lending Association (ISLA) sent a letter to the French tax authority about changes being made to Articles 119 bis A and 119 bis 2...